Interview Portfolio

Nidhi Sharma

Technical Program Manager · Data platforms, migrations & enterprise analytics

Tell me about yourself

The one unified intro · ~90 seconds

Listen

I’m a Technical Program Manager. Most of my work sits around data migrations, pipelines, and enterprise analytics.

I started at TCS, working across multiple client engagements over the years. My longest was a four-year run with Adobe in the subscription space, where I learned hands-on ETL and data pipeline design. I also led an offshore scrum team supporting Project Hendrix, an internal CRM tool. Working with different clients taught me how to adapt quickly to new tech stacks, team cultures, and cross-team dependencies.

After moving to the US, I led a migration project at Cohesity driving data validation and cutover planning.

At Palo Alto Networks, I worked in the marketing and growth space, keeping multiple teams aligned across parallel projects.

Now at NetApp, I’m in the partner and channel domain, managing vendor integrations, gathering stakeholder requirements, and owning our roadmaps.

Since I come from an engineering background and spent years as a SQL developer, Tableau developer, and senior analytics lead, I know what technical questions to ask and where data risks hide. My strongest suit is spotting and resolving cross-team dependencies before they block delivery. I focus heavily on the end-to-end data lifecycle, connecting technical roadmaps directly to measurable business outcomes. Whether I’m guiding teams through ambiguous requirements or aligning cross-functional leaders, my goal is always building clear, repeatable execution models.

Lately, I also use my own AI workflows to speed up planning and delivery. If it’s useful, I’m happy to walk you through work I’ve built hands-on with AI tooling — I’ve used Claude and Claude Code to build my own program artifacts and a training system end to end.

Adobe — Subscription Pipeline & CRM

via TCS · Project Hendrix

Listen
~90-second spoken pitch

This was my longest early run — about four years with Adobe, through TCS, during their move to a subscription model. I was hands-on building the ETL and data pipelines behind that transition, and I led an offshore scrum team supporting Project Hendrix, their internal CRM tool.

The hard part was never the code — it was coordinating an offshore engineering team against product and architecture in a different timezone, on a business that was changing underneath us. So I ran the scrum ceremonies, kept the backlog honest, and made sure dependencies between the CRM work and the pipeline work surfaced early, not at release.

Working across so many client engagements taught me to adapt fast — new stacks, new teams, new expectations. And because I was writing the SQL and building the pipelines myself, I learned where data actually breaks and what to ask — which is still how I approach any new program.

Executive breakdown

Overview
Built and maintained the ETL and data-pipeline infrastructure behind Adobe’s shift to subscriptions, and supported Project Hendrix, an internal CRM tool. Led offshore scrum delivery, coordinating engineering, product, and architecture across timezones.
Primary role
Technical Lead & Offshore Scrum Master.
Stakeholders
Director of EngineeringSenior Product ManagerLead ArchitectBusiness Operations Director
Teams aligned
4 teams — Offshore Engineering, QA, Product, Business Operations.
Tech stack
SQL / T-SQLETL pipelinesTableauCRM platformAgile / Scrum

Cohesity — Cloud Data Migration

Pre-IPO · SQL Server → Snowflake

Listen
~90-second spoken pitch

At Cohesity, pre-IPO, I led a cloud data-warehouse migration — moving their sales and renewal revenue data off SQL Server onto Snowflake. The risk with revenue data is obvious: if the numbers don’t match after the move, finance stops trusting the whole platform.

So I ran both systems in parallel for four weeks and validated daily. Early on, source and target were off by around thirty percent, and I built a three-tier set of checks that drove that to exact parity. One gap turned out to be a timezone mismatch between the old servers and the cloud that was throwing off trailing-twelve-month renewals — I traced it to the transformation layer and fixed it upstream.

We cut over on schedule with the financials matching to the penny, zero downtime. The part I’m proudest of isn’t the cutover — it’s that I caught a silent data bug before it ever reached a finance dashboard.

Executive breakdown

Overview
End-to-end cloud data-warehouse migration for sales and renewal revenue data, running four weeks of parallel validation to achieve 100% data parity and a zero-downtime cutover.
Primary role
Technical Program Manager / Data Lead.
Stakeholders
VP of Revenue OperationsDirector of Enterprise ApplicationsPrincipal Data ArchitectFinance Systems Lead
Teams aligned
3 teams — Data Engineering, Sales Operations, Finance Systems.
Tech stack
SQL ServerSnowflakedbtPythonTableau

Palo Alto Networks — Buyer Intent & GTM Growth

5 concurrent workstreams

Listen
~90-second spoken pitch

At Palo Alto Networks I owned a buyer-intent data pipeline across five concurrent workstreams. Enterprise security deals involve a lot of people over a long cycle, and the signals were scattered — third-party intent data in one place, first-party web behavior in another, nothing tied to an account. I built the pipeline that pulled those together, ran entity resolution to roll everything up to real accounts, and pushed the result into the CRM.

Two things I’d point to. First, an upstream vendor kept changing their data format and breaking us, so I enforced strict schema contracts and validation at ingestion — we got to sixty-four of sixty-five daily runs landing on time. Second, we shipped a dashboard the reps wouldn’t touch, so I stopped fighting it and moved the intelligence into the CRM they already lived in — weekly active reps went from eleven to thirty-eight.

That’s the pattern I care about: find the dependency or the friction that’s actually blocking adoption, and fix that one thing.

Executive breakdown

Overview
End-to-end buyer-intent data pipeline across 5 concurrent workstreams — ingesting third-party intent signals, running entity resolution, and delivering insights natively into CRM workflows to accelerate sales cycles.
Primary role
Senior Technical Program Manager.
Stakeholders
VP of Growth MarketingDirector of Sales OperationsPrincipal Data EngineerHead of Demand Generation
Teams aligned
5 teams — Data Engineering, Growth Marketing, Sales Ops / SFDC Admins, Marketing Ops, Product Analytics.
Tech stack
BigQuerySQLPythonSalesforceAirflow / dbtTableau

The interview version

30-sec pitch · tap a question to reveal the answer

30-second explanation

I led a cross-functional data program that combined third-party intent, first-party digital engagement, and CRM account data through an ELT-based cloud analytics flow. Data Engineering owned the pipelines and transformations, while I managed requirements, cross-team dependencies, business definitions, data-quality gates, UAT, and rollout. One important lesson came after our initial Tableau launch: sellers weren’t consistently leaving Salesforce to consume the analytics, so we changed the delivery model and embedded the relevant signals directly into CRM.

What did you actually do?
I ran the program around the technical implementation — coordinated the source owners, Data Engineering, Analytics, CRM Engineering, Marketing Ops, Sales Ops, and pilot users; established the integrated plan and dependencies; drove unresolved metric definitions to closure; managed RAID and decision tracking; established quality and readiness gates; and coordinated UAT and rollout. I wasn’t the engineer writing every pipeline.
Was this ETL or ELT?
Primarily ELT. We first landed source data into the cloud data platform, then applied standardization and business transformations downstream.
What was technically difficult?
Less about moving data, more about making it usable across organizational boundaries — different source systems, inconsistent account definitions, external API dependencies, and downstream CRM requirements. The challenge was making those pieces operate as one governed data flow.
What was the biggest dependency?
Account-level output depended on source availability and agreed business definitions. A pipeline could technically run, but if Sales and Marketing disagreed on what counted as an engaged account, the analytics wouldn’t be trusted — so I treated metric-definition sign-off as a dependency, not just documentation.
What did engineering own?
Data Engineering owned ingestion, transformations, orchestration, and technical data-quality implementation. CRM Engineering owned the Salesforce integration. Analytics helped define and validate the business logic. I owned the program coordination and governance across those teams.
What went wrong?
Two things. Teams interpreted engagement differently, so we standardized definitions before continuing. And the initial BI delivery didn’t match the sellers’ workflow — feedback showed the intelligence belonged inside Salesforce, so we changed the delivery surface rather than forcing more training.
What would you do differently?
Validate the consumption workflow earlier. I validated what data users needed, but not enough where they needed to consume it. I now treat the delivery surface as part of the functional requirements.

NetApp — Partner MDF & Vendor Migration

Partner & channel domain

Listen
~90-second spoken pitch

At NetApp I’m in the partner and channel space, and I run two things in parallel. One is a vendor data-warehouse migration — managing the integration and the source-to-target mapping as we move off one vendor’s platform. The other is partner-marketing attribution, the MDF program — figuring out what every partner-marketing dollar actually sourced.

That’s a messy data-hygiene problem: partner and customer names come in free-text, multi-language, across marketing, CRM, and ERP, and none of it joins cleanly. I designed the matching logic — fuzzy matching with confidence thresholds — that resolved hundreds of thousands of records to real accounts, with a human-review queue for the ones the system wasn’t sure about, so a bad match never drove a payout.

Day to day I’m gathering stakeholder requirements, owning the roadmaps, and keeping partner ops, data engineering, and marketing aligned. And I lean on my own AI workflows to compress the front end — turning thirty-plus stakeholder interviews into a prioritized roadmap in days.

Executive breakdown

Overview
Run concurrent partner/channel programs — a vendor data-warehouse migration (integration and source-to-target mapping) and the MDF partner-marketing attribution engine that unifies marketing, CRM, and ERP data to show what partner spend actually sources. Own requirements gathering and roadmaps across partner operations.
Primary role
Senior Technical Program Manager & Analytics Lead.
Stakeholders
VP of Worldwide Partner OrganizationDirector of Channel MarketingLead Enterprise ArchitectGlobal Controller
Teams aligned
4 teams — Partner Operations, Data Engineering, Global Marketing Operations, Channel Finance.
Tech stack
BigQuerySQLPython (fuzzy matching)SalesforceSAPTableau
If it’s useful, I can walk you through work I’ve built hands-on with AI tooling — program artifacts and a training system built end to end with Claude and Claude Code.

Private interview prep · not indexed, not shared.